Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 18
Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 18
A
STANDARD SYSTEM FOR INVESTIGATING AND CLASSIFYING VIOLENT CRIMES
SECOND
EDITION
John E. Douglas,
Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Burgess, and Robert K. Ressler, Editors
The research began by identifying numerous
examples of intent, actions, and attitudes that appellate courts have upheld as
reflecting heinous, atrocious, cruel, vile, inhuman, wanton, or horrible crimes
(Welner, 1998). This included a victimology of the worst of crimes as well.
In order to distinguish depraved features
from those items earning aggravator status to serve the aims of public policy—but
that do not uniformly distinguish a heinous or evil act (examples include using
a deadly weapon, ambushing, killing a witness to disrupt testimony, and
preventing arrest or escaping custody)—the intents, actions, attitudes, and
victimologies of those upheld appellate cases were distilled and organized
under headings shaped by psychiatric diagnoses associated with the most
pernicious behavior.
Comments
Post a Comment