Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 26
Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 26
A
STANDARD SYSTEM FOR INVESTIGATING AND CLASSIFYING VIOLENT CRIMES
SECOND
EDITION
John E. Douglas,
Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Burgess, and Robert K. Ressler, Editors
Detailed
descriptions of items are important guidelines to law enforcement and
investigators. Those who investigate crimes have the greatest proximity to evidence
that reflects on the required evidence for items such as “disrespect for the
victim after the fact,” or evidence that such an item is not present.
Evidence
for the depravity of the crime may be derived from numerous sources of
information available to the investigator. Examples of these appear in Table
4.3.
Criminal
profiling and even many forensic science methodologies do not reliably guarantee
that the same conclusions will be generated by qualified professionals
conducting a given examination. This lack of interrater reliability, which has
limited the potential for evidence’s admissibility, is care- fully addressed in
the definitions and thresholds of items of the Depravity Standard. A qualified,
trained professional who adheres to the guidelines of the Depravity Standard is
therefore likely to arrive at the same determination about a crime (low,
medium, or high depravity) as another colleague following those same protocols
(Welner, 2005).
Comments
Post a Comment