Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 3 19

 


Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 3 19

A STANDARD SYSTEM FOR INVESTIGATING AND CLASSIFYING VIOLENT CRIMES

SECOND EDITION

John E. Douglas, Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Burgess, and Robert K. Ressler, Editors

 

Preparing for the Prescriptive Interview

I have no data yet. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts. Arthur Conan Doyle, A Scandal in Bohemia

 

Prescriptive interviewing is a tool to supplement law enforcement efforts in achieving successful results during the interview. It will also serve to elevate the interviewer’s awareness of steps that can be applied to increase interview effectiveness. Enhanced interview skills and techniques are especially fitting in the light of the Supreme Court’s decision in the case Minnick v. Mississippi (1990), when it ruled six to two precluding law enforcement officials from reengaging a suspect after the suspect had requested an attorney. The Court stated that “when counsel is requested, interrogation must cease, and officials may not re-initiate interrogation without counsel present, whether or not the accused has consulted with his attorney.” Consequently, it is best to assume that law enforcement has one opportunity to interview a defendant. Therefore, the interviewer will serve the public’s best interest with an exhaustive preparation. If the interview does not terminate with the confession, neither will it be unresolved with a burden of regrets.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 3 17

Is the role of deviant sexual fantasy related to the types of sexual offence committed by Ted Bundy? (9)

Crime Classification Manual Part II Chapter 9 B 12