Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 7

 


Crime Cl
assification Manual Part I Chapter 4 7

A STANDARD SYSTEM FOR INVESTIGATING AND CLASSIFYING VIOLENT CRIMES

SECOND EDITION

John E. Douglas, Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Burgess, and Robert K. Ressler, Editors

 

Aggravators Relating to the Crime Itself

Of all the themes of aggravating factors, aggravators linked to what a person did in the course of carrying out a crime most protect the justice system from bias, prejudice, privilege, and other unintended inequalities in sentencing. The subjectivity of assessment of future dangerousness, for example, parallels the subjectivity of an assessment of future docility. Nothing speaks for a crime like the crime itself.

Each state, along with the federal system, has its own criminal codes and sentencing guidelines. These codes, enacted by legislative initiative and interpreted by courts, contribute to distinct applications of justice. This decentralization also means that identical crimes, prosecuted in different jurisdictions, are punished based on different factors. Depending on the level of judicial initiative in giving jury instructions, even more distinct outcomes are possible for each case.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 3 17

Is the role of deviant sexual fantasy related to the types of sexual offence committed by Ted Bundy? (9)

Crime Classification Manual Part II Chapter 9 B 12