Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 5


 

Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 4 5

A STANDARD SYSTEM FOR INVESTIGATING AND CLASSIFYING VIOLENT CRIMES

SECOND EDITION

John E. Douglas, Ann W. Burgess, Allen G. Burgess, and Robert K. Ressler, Editors

 

 

While American justice and law enforcement are closely scrutinized for their imperfections and criticized for them, their openness to growth and evolution is the embodiment of justice. The utility of and need for punishment carves out a coexistence with compassion and rehabilitative goals.

Numerous factors diminish punishment, or the severity of sentencing, in American courts. An offender’s previous history, social disadvantage, presence of mental illness or possibility of coinciding intoxication, lesser role in a crime, stature in the community, and negative impact of the punishment on others are examples of qualities that mitigate punishment. When these fac- tors distinguish an individual, American courts may choose to mete out a less severe sentence to a convicted offender. Mitigating factors primarily relate to context, such as who the offender is and why the crime was committed.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Crime Classification Manual Part I Chapter 3 17

Is the role of deviant sexual fantasy related to the types of sexual offence committed by Ted Bundy? (9)

Crime Classification Manual Part II Chapter 9 B 12